Comparing Frost’s Mending Wall and Rosenblatt’s A Game of Catch :: comparison compare contrast essays

Robert Frosts Mending W altogether and Roger Rosenblatts A adventure of Catch Humans have an uncanny ability to put themselves at a comfortable distance from each other and call it a mutual understanding, a friendship, or even true love, but it is all lies. The essence of mans mystery is somewhat of a paradox. He yearns to become more familiar with those around him, just he is unwilling to hold this to happen. The power of Mending Wall, one of Frosts most often quoted poems, rests upon an opposition. Its two famous lines contradict each other. The poem upholds that Something there is that doesnt love a wall. But it similarly asserts that Good fences make good neighbors. The contradiction is reasonable, for two different types of people utter the conflicting remarks and both are right. Man can non live without walls, boundaries, limits and especially self-limitations yet he resents all fetters and is happy at the destruction of any barrier. In Mending Wall the boundary line is useless There where it is we do not need the wall. And, to stress the point, the speaker facetiously adds He is all pine and I am apple orchard. My apple trees will never get across And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him. One may find far-reaching connotations in this poem. As well as that it states one of the greatest difficulties of our time whether depicted object walls should be made stronger for our safety, or whether they should be let down, since they impede our progress toward understanding and eventual common humanity. Mending Wall can also be considered a symbolic poem. In the voices of the two men the younger, capricious, modern speaker and the old-fashioned farmer who replies with his one dogged sentence, his inherited aphorism. Some may observe the opposition of two forces the zeal of revolt, which challenges tradition, and the spirit of restraint, which insists that customs must be upheld, built up and continually rebuilt, as a matter of principle. Th e poet himself looks down upon much(prenominal) symbolic analysis. He denies that the poem says anything more than it seems to say. The dispute is the heart of the poem. It answers itself in the paradox of people, in neighbors and competitors, in the antagonistic nature of man. Roger Rosenblatts essay, A Game of