The Future of Freedom Essay -- essays research papers fc

munimentThe Future of FreedomIn his book, The Future of Freedom, Fareed Zakaria writes that we must make democracy safe for the world. The American democracy sets the standard around the world for unaffixed democracies, besides transitions across for other countries across the world toward a broad-minded democracy is often difficult and with poor decision making, close to impossible. big democracies are the brasss in which people choose their government and live in an environment of freedom. In Zakarias book, he warns the readers of several telltale signs that their motion toward a liberal democracy is in trouble. He uses examples of different countries doing it function and doing it wrong- the ones discussed in this essay will be Russia and china.After the communist crack in Russia, Zakaria writes that Russia concentrated too much on a libertine fix. The leaders wanted to mimic the American democracy an instituted free and handsome elections, but they forgot about esta blishing a stable economy. Robert Kaplan writes in his essay, Was Democracy unsloped a Moment? that countries need to establish a stable frugal system sooner they try to institute a political system or else that political system will fail. Specific everyy, Kaplan thinks that there should be a loyal and large middle class in the nation before it leaders think democracy will work. Kaplan was not the only understanding to say this Aristotle believed that a strong middle class bred a strong society. The idea about this is that democracy cannot work if the majority of a pastoral is poor and starving while a small minority has all the money. The poor will be too preoccupied with trying to break than maintaining the government. Russia relied too much on its natural resources instead of trying to take a leak a functioning economy (Zakaria, 92). Zakaria writes, Russias fundamental problem is not that it is a poor country struggling to modernize, but rather that it is a rich country s truggling to modernize (92). By making the fault of first fixing the political system before the economy, and then mismanaging its resources, Russias political system fell prey to corruption. Zakaria writes, Yeltsin did little to build institutions in Russia. In fact he weakened almost all competing centers of great power-the legislature, the courts, regional governors (93). ... ...e his blessing for open economic markets (Zakaria, 83). That leads us to the present time.With examples like Singapore, China hopes to maintain its current situation. Zakaria writes, Their role model is former prime rector Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore. Lee achieved the dream of every strongmen to modernize the economy, even the society, of his country, but not the politics (85). Ironically, Zakaria feels Chinese officials should return to the teachings of Karl Marx for help. He writes, Marx understood that when a country modernizes its economy, embraces capitalism, and creates a bourgeoisie, the politica l system will change to smooth that transformation (Zakaria, 87). Zakaria holds hope that the leaders will come around and judge the inevitability of China eventually becoming a liberal democracy. exclusively of those involved, realize that that process will be a long and backbreaking one because hardly any leader ever gives up his power willingly.Works CitedKaplan, Robert D. Was Democracy Just a Moment? The Atlantic Monthly. capital of Massachusetts December, 1997.Zakaria, Fareed. The Future of Freedom. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, 2004.